Abstract
Introduction
Patients interested in aesthetic plastic surgery procedures increasingly seek advice on social media and rely on easily accessible online information. The investigatory goal was to determine the impact of this phenomenon on the everyday aesthetic plastic surgery practice.
Methods and Patients
Five hundred consecutive patients completed a questionnaire prior to their consultation with a plastic surgeon at our clinic. A questionnaire was also completed by 128 plastic surgeons practising in 19 different countries. A literature review was performed.
Results
Almost all patients (95 %) used the internet to collect information prior to consultation, for 68 % of them it being their first search method. Social media were used by 46 % of patients and 40 % of these were strongly influenced when choosing a specific doctor. The majority of plastic surgeons (85 %) thought the information found on social media could lead to unrealistic expectations. However, 45 % of plastic surgeons believed that their consultations became easier after the advent of social media, 29 % found them more difficult. A literature review showed a high percentage of poor quality internet websites regarding plastic surgery and an increase in use of social media among plastic surgeons.
Conclusion
The internet and social media play an important and growing role in plastic surgery. This results in more informed patients but may create unrealistic expectations. Even if the internet provides ample information, it cannot replace the face-to-face consultation, which always should remain a detailed process, covering both risks and limitations of alternative procedures. Available literature on how social media influences the medical practice is still scarce and further research is needed.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fox S, Duggan M (2013) Health Online 2013. PewResearch Internet Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/
Jejurikar SS, Rovak JM, Kuzon WM, Chung KC, Kotsis SV, Cederna PS (2002) Evaluation of plastic surgery information on the internet. Ann Plast Surg 49:460–465
Gordon JB, Barot LR, Fahey AL, Matthews MS (2001) The Internet as a source of information on breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:171–176
Domanski MC, Cavale N (2012) Self-reported “worth it” rating of aesthetic surgery in social media. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:1292–1295
Szychta P, Zielinski T, Rykala J, Witmanowski H, Kruk-Jeromin J (2012) Role of the internet in communication between patient and surgeon before rhinoplasty. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 46:248–251
Fox S (2011) Peer-to-peer Healthcare. PewResearch Internet Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/02/28/peer-to-peer-health-care-2/
Zaidi FH, Jones CA (2009) Informing patients: oculoplastic surgery and the internet. Eye 23:2090–2093
Parikh AR, Kok K, Redfern B, Clarke A, Withey S, Butler PE (2006) A portal to validated websites on cosmetic surgery: the design of an archetype. Ann Plast Surg 57:350–352
Smarrito S, Mitrofanoff M, Haddad R, Pavy B (2003) Do we need a chart of quality for websites related to cosmetic surgery? Ann Chir Plast Esthet 48:222–227
Liao LM, Taghinejadi N, Creighton SM (2012) An analysis of the content and clinical implications of online advertisements for female genital cosmetic surgery. BMJ Open. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001908
Nassab R, Hamnett N, Nelson K, Kaur S, Greensill B, Dhital S, Juma A (2010) Cosmetic tourism: public opinion and analysis of information and content available on the internet. Aesthet Surg J 30:465–469
Aliu O, Chung KC (2010) Readability of ASPS and ASAPS educational web sites: an analysis of consumer impact. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1271–1278
Hoppe IC, Ahuja NK, Ingargiola MJ, Granick MS (2013) A survey of patient comprehension of readily accessible online educational material regarding plastic surgery procedures. Aesthet Surg J 33:436–442
Walden JL, Panagopoulous G, Shrader SW (2010) Contemporary decision making and perception in patients undergoing cosmetic breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 30:395–403
Wong WW, Camp MC, Camp JS, Gupta SC (2010) The quality of internet advertising in aesthetic surgery: an in-depth analysis. Aesthet Surg J 30:735–743
Fansa H, Haller S (2011) Patients’ decision for aesthetic surgery. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 43:368–375
Vardanian AJ, Kusnezov N, Im DD, Lee JC, Jarrahy R (2013) Social media use and impact on plastic surgery practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1184–1193
Wong WW, Gupta SC (2011) Plastic surgery marketing in a generation of “tweeting”. Aesthet Surg J 31:972–976
Wheeler CK, Said H, Prucz R, Rodrich RJ, Mathes DW (2011) Social media in plastic surgery practices: emerging trends in North America. Aesthet Surg J 31:435–441
Stevens RJG, Hamilton NM, O’Donoghue JM, Davies MP (2012) The use of the internet and social software by plastic surgeons. Eur J Plast Surg 35:747–755
Martin Salzmann-Erikson RN, Henrik Eriksson RN (2011) Torrenting values, feelings, and thoughts-cyber nursing and virtual self-care in a breast augmentation forum. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being. doi:10.3402/qhw.v6i4.7378
Carraway JH (2006) Internet medical marketing: “Anything goes”? Aesthet Surg J 26:188–189
Rohrich RJ (2001) The web and your cosmetic surgery practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1253–1254
Camp SM, Mills DC (2012) The marriage of plastic surgery and social media: a relationship to last a lifetime. Aesthet Surg J 32:349–351
Acknowledgments
Dr Montemurro is a consultant and speaker for Allergan, Inc. Dr Hedén is a consultant and speaker for Allergan, Inc.
Conflict of interest
The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Montemurro, P., Porcnik, A., Hedén, P. et al. The Influence of Social Media and Easily Accessible Online Information on the Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Practice: Literature Review and Our Own Experience. Aesth Plast Surg 39, 270–277 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0454-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0454-3